Götaholmaren

- Livet i division 6A -

Det var som fan!

why did you use this kind of word? is that a bad news ( Det var som fan!) I´m supprise are you taking side??

It's just a saying when you are surprised, it's not a bad word or negative. I might as well used in another context. Like when a team signed a good player or an unexpected win. I just thought we heard the last of this, that's the surprise.



I write what I think. And if I agree or disagree with something I will write it here. I have a right to take sides on my own blogg. What I try to do is to give the readers all the facts and they can make up their own mind.



In this case I believe FCB is the correct champion since UAFC used a player tha wasn't allowed to play and won games because of it. That's my opinion, I'm not an official blogg of 6A or have any connection with GFF or SvFF.



I also believe that UAFC played some of the best football last season and had some great players but rules are rules.

oogag du glömde CAPS LOCK

HAHAHAHA OK MUJO HERE IT IS FOR YOU, I JUST LOVE FOOTBALL AND I SUPPORT UAFC, THEY PLAYED REALLY GOOD BUT MISTAKES HAPPEN THATS ALL I REALLY WANT THEM TO PLAY DIV 5 THIS SEASON,

Well... I don't think your comments on Rasta's blogg will take UAFC to div 5. So you might aswell stop.

Rasta i totally agree you with that rules are rules but didn't the GFF know this before taking a ridiculous decision?Now answer this question,taking points from UAFC affected Bjorndammen to r

elagation but the GFF already make the decision for them to stay in div 6 but you are there saying rules are rules.

If I understand the SvFF decision to send back the case to GFF correctly it was sent back because GFF had failed to explain why FC Bosonas protest was ok (since it was handed in late) and why the league was changed more than 14 days after the end of season. SvFF did NOT send back the case because they ruled that UAFC had done nothing wrong. Everybody agrees (both SvFF and GFF) that the transfer of Bosco Godson was incorrect.



However GFF have the right to allow a protest late and to change the league more than 14 days after the season is done if there's "special circumstances". GFF made a misstake when they did not explain these "special circumstances" when they made the ruling that UAFC should lose points.



That is why SvFF granted the latest UAFC-protest and now SvFF is asking GFF to explain these "special circumstances".



I believe that it would be very unfair if either Öjersjö OR Björndammen would be relegated. Öjersjö because they lost 1-0 to UAFC when Bosco played (and played very good) and that's not fair since he shouldn't have been allowed to play. BBK because before the last game of the season BBK thought that they already were set to play division 6 2012. They thought their last game was meaningless (of course you always want to win) and let a lot of subs play and so on.



So I believe GFF made the right decision to make it 13 teams 2012.



I also believe that these "special circumstances" is that the facts about Bosco didn't appear until the season was over, FCB couldn't have made the protest earlier since they didn't know about Bosco. It's not like FCB knew about Bosco all the time and just waited to see if they would win the league and if not they would file a protest. I know because I was in the middle of it. Also since both FCB and UAFC was in the top I believe that it's "special circumstances" since the ruling would decide which team would win the league...



In the end it comes down to the fact that UAFC have made a misstake and the only ones you really can blame is the people in UAFC handling the Bosco Godson-transfer. It's not FCB's fault, or SvFF or GFF or this bloggs...

Ok all well said,fine n good.Now what is awaiting the decision now cos since the Svff had proven Gff wrongly?cos this special circumstances can still be reverted in favor of UAFC cos FCB file in a late protest,what do think should happen now?

I really don't know but it feels like GFF will stick with their point-deduction for UAFC but now they will give SvFF the proper motivation. I think SvFF will accept that. But I'm just speculating. It's very late to change the leagues again. All the teams are set and even the dates for the games are set now...



But you never know with GFF and SvFF

Ok let be real here,if rules are rules just as you've said then WHY didn't GFF stick to the rules at first knowing that FCB filed in a late protest?GFF was so faulty and ignorant by taking such decision or maybe they thot UAFC doesn't know there rights.Me,You and GFF knows the truth and as for Rasta you've been doing some great job here but lets face the fact the GFF tried to bend the rules. Ok UAFC accepted they did wrongly as per the bosco transfer,though they went through a channel where they make mistake as we all know about.GFF and many teams have BIAS thought to a that is growing within the space of 4 seasons and they've done far better.Well i hope GFF give UAFC the title cos if it were you Rasta you around about the same way UAFC did cos FCB protest was far too late and you know these 'let call a spade a spade'

bias thot to a team that is growing

*if it were u rasta u will go the same way

uafc did*

I don't agree that GFF bended the rules. GFF have the right to accept late protests AND to change the league more than 14 days after the season is over. What SvFF reacted to was that GFF did NOT motivate and explain why FCB:s protest should be allowed and why the pointdeduction for UAFC should be allowed more than 14 days after the season ended.



Then of course there is the question if GFF SHOULD use their right to allow late protests in this specific case. I think GFF will tell SvFF that the "special circumstances" in this case is that it involved the two top-teams and that protest should be allowed since it affected the outcome of the league. Unfortunatley for UAFC I think SvFF will accept that explaination and keep FCB as champions.



Again, this is just me speculating.



I'm not really sure what you mean by "if it were rasta u will go the same way"? You mean if my team was in UAFC:s situation and if I wanted them to counter-protest to stay champions.



If Götaholm would have played with a player that didn't really belong to the club I would accept whatever penalty GFF would give to the club.



Of course I understand that UAFC want to stay champions and since it's in their rights to counter-protest, of course they should do that if they feel it's the right thing to do.



I know UAFC is not the most popular team and there is a lot of rumors from other teams about cheating and what not. I have chosen not to write anything about that here because if I don't have the evidence I'm not going to call a team cheaters. I've writen about the Bosco-case because I saw the evidence.



However, I don't believe in a conspiracy were GFF is trying to get UAFC.

Write what ever you want is your blog raster, the fart is you are not the decision maker in this case. if not for the mistake from UAFC, you wont be nagging about this and if not for GFF mistake for not given any reason taking the point after 2 months league as ended no body will come back here be commenting about this, so everybody make mistake so u can see nobody is above mistake. Rules is rules let GFF flow there own rules of law.

Of course I write what I want, that's the point of having my own blogg ;-). And of course I don't make any decisions or have any power regarding the GFF (even though some people seem to think so). I'm not nagging about anything, I'm answering comments made on my blogg. I report about what's going on in 6A and the fact that SvFF wants GFF to reconsider their decision is a pretty big deal so of course I will write about it.



Of course nobody would be commenting about this if it never happend? That's kind of no-brainer...



Of course mistakes are made, I never said anything about that, but if you make mistakes you have to deal with the circumstances. UAFC made a mistake and GFF made one as well. But if GFF would let everybody of the hook that said it was a mistake all teams could just cheat and claim it was a mistake. Therefore GFF have to follow their rules, mistake or no mistake. It's impossible for GFF to know when it's a mistake and when it's a intentional break of the rules.



And as I mentioned many times GFF have the rights to accept late protests and change the league-

Yes they do have the right, but take it in the lawfull way GFF. You doning your job My friend and i respect that rasta, bloggers are like this make this more more sweet so ppl can check what you they have hahaha. nagging or not nagging let wait and see the out come of this. .. Hope we all make this a better fotball this season.

I'm not really following what you're saying.



In the case of GFF and the fact that they HAVE the right doesn't mean they have to USE it. That's another matter. I believe they should and of course I understand that UAFC want GFF not to use it.



I haven't that much about UAFC lately because I thought the whole thing was over, but of course I had to write about it when it popped up again.



I'm also waiting for the outcome but I think it's ok to have a debate here on the commentary-section of the blogg. I never start the commentaries, I just answer them.



I can see that you think of it as nagging but that's because I have to make the same points over and over again...



What would be nice would be to hear about UAFC players for next season? Who's in and who's out?



That's the kind of things I want to write about when it comes to UAFC!

Soon u will see who in and out my friend

First off i want to comment about Rasta/gotaholmarens blogg, we all understand that this is ur blogg and u are doing your job as a blogger, but lets get one thing straight doing a job like this, u should first learn not to be biased, thats that. I get that there is a situation here, and in every situation there is a solution right?, and on this blogg there are never any solutions, thats why i tell my fellow players not to waste thier time commenting on what you or n.e one writes because there is never any solution and this blogg never gives answers (Its fun to read though, knowing how much people loooove us that the spend so much time discussing about us), instead discussions become hostile and make ppl disrespect and abuse each other, there is a problem in div 6 A(2011) and as we all know the case is being handled right now by GFF & SvFF who actually have the Solution. This discussion started 2011 and its 2012 now, and we keep on going front and back about it, the fact is that SvFF have the final say in any matter that concerns swedish football. so why don't WE mind our business(teams), and let the teams involved to handle what is at hand with GFF & SvFF, and let them do thier work.

Now about never getting any news about whats going on in the UAFC camp, plans or who is in or out, UAFC is an unpredictable team, full of surprises, & definetly greatness so instead of spending precious training time and rest towards the upcoming season on what THE MEDIA/Bad minded people think is right or wrong, they are using that time to focus on what is vital to them, like being the best at what they do PLAY FOOTBALL, UAFC have and will never be a bunch of media whores(excuse my french). So if anyone feels that talking about UAFC makes them sleep better at night then they should keep on doing that, but please stop directing questions to the UAFC team/Fans, because football is about the game so if you have anything to say, meet us on the pitch and say all you have to within 90 minutes after that it's goodbye.



p.s

Except it goes into extra time

then u can say a lil more.

lol!



Former *** UAFC.

Well, if you believe the blogg is biased than you have the right to that opinion.



The thing is that I do express my OPINION here but I always try to give the readers the facts so they can make up their own mind.



In the Bosco-case I wrote all the facts I knew and then I wrote my opinion. And I been proven right now both by GFF and SvFF. Boscos transfer was not made in a correct manner. We all know that.



It will be pretty boring with a blogg without opinions? As I said I always try to have facts before I write. Sometimes I don't have the facts and then I write that I don't have the facts. And that I'm just speculating.



If you believe that I'm biased because I wrote about Bosco than that stand for you. If another club would have done the same I would have written about that. But as far as I know no other club in 6A have played with an unregistered player. I could have written tons of stuff about UAFC during the season. There is a lot of rumors about players playing under different names and other stuff. But I DID NOT do that, because I don't believe in accusing a team when I don't have the evidence. In my eyes you are innocent until proven guilty. And the only case UAFC been proven guilty is the Bosco-case. Even if GFF would take back FCB-decision and give the title to UAFC, the fact is still that UAFC used a player that shouldn't have played.



Looking over the season I have been a fan of UAFC and praising the way they play and praising their players. I don't see that the blogg would be biased against UAFC.



I want to know about news from UAFC for the same reason I want to know about news from all 6A-teams. It will make the blogg more fun and that will make the whole 6A more fun. That's why I write the blogg.



And I not going to stop asking questions to UAFC-people. It's weird if you as an ex-UAFC-players speaks for everybody involved in UAFC? It not like I'm trying to get UAFC in any way. I'm curious about who's leaving and who's still there.



It seems like all the other teams in 6A can focus both on soccer AND "the media" and of course I have to accept that if no one from UAFC wants to talk to me. But I don't think that's your call?